tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5730822.post8023510454195432254..comments2024-03-28T19:45:50.194-07:00Comments on the joy of sox: Birth Of A Nicknameallanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04673233312198832937noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5730822.post-75559403463078741102008-06-10T12:55:00.000-07:002008-06-10T12:55:00.000-07:00yowch.this is just about as dorky as it could poss...yowch.<BR/><BR/>this is just about as dorky as it could possibly be. <BR/><BR/>And I say this as a dork myself.Spencer Brownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11666293541519622363noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5730822.post-3786436212218435942008-06-10T09:36:00.000-07:002008-06-10T09:36:00.000-07:00I don't think so. At first, I was being a bit sill...I don't think so. At first, I was being a bit silly, meaning "I don't care what you see, he <I>is</I> on fire!" even though he really wasn't -- I posted an ON FIRE after he hit into a fielder's choice -- though it turns out he was actually starting to hit at the same time.allanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04673233312198832937noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5730822.post-59082872188420825452008-06-10T09:21:00.000-07:002008-06-10T09:21:00.000-07:00I always thought "on fire" came from one of those ...I always thought "on fire" came from one of those discussions we had about whether a guy can be "hot" or whether it's all just random. And I was saying how a roulette wheel or dice can't be hot or streaky, but a player can because he's human. That stuff.Jerehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13448619048422750447noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5730822.post-79496354307923203572008-06-10T09:01:00.000-07:002008-06-10T09:01:00.000-07:00"On Fire" was not in the Glossary! Jeez. ... It is..."On Fire" was <I>not</I> in the Glossary! Jeez. ... It is now.allanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04673233312198832937noreply@blogger.com