Pages

May 25, 2008

G53: Athletics 6, Red Sox 3

Red Sox   - 100 020 000 - 3   7  3
Athletics - 101 200 20x - 6 11 0
Johnny Vander Meer's record remains safe. Jack Hannahan singled on Lester's fourth pitch of the afternoon, one of seven hits Oakland collected off of the Sox lefty in five innings. The A's also received two walks.

Boston cut the A's 4-1 lead to 4-3 in the fifth, after Blanton walked the bases full and Manny Ramirez (3-for-4) wrapped a hard single to center.

Optimism was in the air, but with two outs in the bottom of the seventh, Javy Lopez was called upon to retire Jack Cust with a man on base. Cust drove Lopez's first pitch over the wall in left-center for a two-run dong. And that was the ball game.

Tampa's 5-4 walk-off win over the Orioles puts the Rays in first place in the East. Boston is now .5 GB.

***

Jon Lester (3.41, 128 ERA+) / Joe Blanton (3.87, 99 ERA+)

Gordon Edes, re Lester's last start:
Brian Rowley is an optometrist who lives in Santaquin, Utah, about 20 miles south of Provo. He has been to two Red Sox games in his life. The first was Clay Buchholz's no-hitter last Sept. 1 ... The second was Jon Lester's no-hitter Monday night.

166 comments:

  1. Work calls, so have at it ...

    (Washburn/Wang at 1)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sea 2, NYY 1 (top 4)

    TB 1, Bal 1 (top 3)

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is a vast conspiracy going on to keep me from being around for a agme. Actually, I might catch the 1st few innings before I have to leave for a while. If the "new and improved" game times keep up I'll never make it back for the end.
    Spent yesterday evening at a cookout thrown by a transplant from Long Island, East Islip to be exact. Great guy, Mets fan. His family was down for the holiday. I caught some serious grief about my hat, but most of them were of the "better that than a Yankee fan" opinion :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not entirely sure I understand the desire for short games. Seems like longer games are better both at the park and on tv, from a revenue perspective. More beer & more commercial sales.

    ReplyDelete
  5. More baseball > Less baseball

    ReplyDelete
  6. SEA - 001 200 -- 3 4 0
    NYY - 001 01 -- 2 4 1

    BAL - 010 0 -- 1 3 0
    TBR - 014 0 -- 5 8 0

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nice snag by Beltre to keep the lead for SEA. I'm flicking between that game, softball, and the Indy 500. Good day.

    Meanwhile, I'm also doing all sorts of stuff with the www.nsnavs.com website (it looks a lot less sucky than it once did)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oatmeal from Oakland:

    Jacoby Ellsbury, CF
    Dustin Pedroia, 2B
    David Ortiz, DH
    Manny Ramirez, LF
    Mike Lowell, 3B
    Kevin Youkilis, 1B
    J.D. Drew, RF
    Jason Varitek, C
    Julio Lugo, SS

    ReplyDelete
  9. Santana velocity down?
    Olney: "He is short-arming the ball more than he has in the past -- and this is after some red flags appeared in the physical examination he underwent before signing with the Mets."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh those wacky independent leagues.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sarah: Wasn't a player traded for some catfish a few years ago?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Did you guys see this?

    Traded for bats...


    That's classic. We will sometimes say a player is traded for a ham sandwich, but that's just an expression. This really happened!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hahaha - I'd totally forgotten about the catfish trade.

    Mmmm... catfish...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Catfish! Even better. (Hadn't gotten that far down the thread yet.)

    Have fun, all. I'll be listening from work but not threading much.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's not looking good for Danica Patrick at the Indy 500. She's running 8th and appears to be falling off.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Meanwhile, the Mariners still lead the Yanks 5-2 in the 8th.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I still prefer the player who was traded for himself.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Chiti

    ReplyDelete
  18. FUCK -- my mlbtv isn't working.

    It was fine yesterday, but today it says I don't have silverlight -- which I sure as fuck do have.

    SHIT!

    ReplyDelete
  19. wait wait wait --

    using the old player -- which should not work, according to mlb and my past experience -- looks like it may work.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hooray! Second cable box is up and running!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mariners still striving to give the game away.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I got the TV36 station, but at least I got something.

    ReplyDelete
  23. AND I've got NESN. Dave is contentedly watching some true crime nonsense in the living room. Could life be better?

    (Answer, yes, we could WIN. And I could not feel like poo.)

    ReplyDelete
  24. Hi all. I will be checking in and out. Way too gorgeous out to sit inside. But I'll be listening anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Wow - now I'm annoyed by the hummer greenwash commercial I just saw.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Why does Putz have to be such a putz?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Phil, these are just mysteries of the universe.

    ReplyDelete
  28. PUTZ you jerk! The Red Sox were counting on you.

    ReplyDelete
  29. For a minute there I thought Sweeney was going to catch that gull!

    ReplyDelete
  30. you ain't catching that one.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Time for the bats to wake up folks

    ReplyDelete
  32. Well, don't say that with such surprise, Joe! He IS Papi.

    ReplyDelete
  33. It's nice to be a dong's length ahead. Especially Papi's, since his is always the longest, unless Manny wants to show us his dong too.

    ReplyDelete
  34. That's ok. We like it messy too.

    ReplyDelete
  35. At least he can get the nohitter off his mind, or something.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Booo, someone crashed into Danica on pit road

    ReplyDelete
  37. Lester, Lester, Lester, Lester!

    ReplyDelete
  38. M's down to their final strike.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I hadn't noticed Baltimore came back! 4-4

    ReplyDelete
  40. Maybe he used up all his strikes last week?

    ReplyDelete
  41. Does anyone know why I'm getting commercials on both home and away stations today? I thought MLB audio only had commercials on home games. Bah.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Did I scare everyone away...?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yes. You only have yourself to blame.

    ReplyDelete
  44. BAL - 010 012 000
    TBR - 004 000 001

    Looks like we'll have to get it done ourselves today.

    ReplyDelete
  45. MLB.com: "A's squash no-hit drama early against Lester."

    Stay classy, MLB.com.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Laura, if there's one thing I know, it's thst you can never count on any consistency from any MLB product.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Good point, Sarah.

    My bad for forgetting such a basic premise of life: if MLB can fuck it up, they will.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Got work - so just listening to the A's tv.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Drat.

    Dear bats, I love and miss you...

    ReplyDelete
  50. Phillies up 15-6. Spare a run, brutha?

    ReplyDelete
  51. cannot listen to the A's guys.

    in talking about the sox playing long games, they mentioned games against the yankees and said the umpires in those games don't know whether to call a pitch a ball or a strike because here are the two best teams and they each make and pay a lot of money.

    wtf?

    ReplyDelete
  52. It's amazing how some people have jobs

    ReplyDelete
  53. What's even more frustrating about these games is we're not having long at-bats. That and the losing part.

    ReplyDelete
  54. One of these days, when the Revolution happens, there will be all kinds of idiotic out-of-work broadcasters, offering to provide inane sports commentary for food.

    ReplyDelete
  55. One of these days, when the Revolution happens

    Couldja hurry that up, pls?

    ReplyDelete
  56. Come on Joe, after the revolution, no one goes hungry. (But still all the people must be off the air!)

    ReplyDelete
  57. This is going to be one of those games, isn't it.

    ReplyDelete
  58. No, this will not be that kind of Revolution. This will be one of the vengeful kinds of Revolution

    ReplyDelete
  59. Wow. Just wow.

    Guess I'll go do some laundry.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Well, this game's in the crapper

    /umbrella theory

    ReplyDelete
  61. As Don said recently: "Lester back to being Lester"

    ReplyDelete
  62. No, this will not be that kind of Revolution. This will be one of the vengeful kinds of Revolution

    Same thing. :)

    ReplyDelete
  63. we could use some "good times" from flo.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Manny drilling the ball up the middle and going 3-for-3 = :>)

    ReplyDelete
  65. What's with the youKKs? I'm not a fan.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Afternoon, chaps. Typical start-after-a-no-hitter from Lester, eh? I've always wondered what the opponent batting average, ERA, average innings pitched, are for all the pitchers' next game after a no-hitter.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Andy:
    "If they show a lady with a NESN sign i am like 10 ft from her."

    ***

    ReplyDelete
  68. You don't think that would be coincidence? There would really be a pattern?

    ReplyDelete
  69. Checking in. I see we are losing. Must be an away game. Sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Come on, Amy, look at the standings and cheer up.

    (Something tells me we've been behind in home games too?)

    ReplyDelete
  71. (Something tells me we've been behind in home games too?)

    Yeah, but only for a total of like 9 minutes all aseason.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I am not down on the team, just hate losing after winning all those games. It's hard to adjust my expectations again.

    ReplyDelete
  73. And down by 1 ... with 3 innings to go?

    This W is in the bag.

    ReplyDelete
  74. I've got a great idea... Let's have some of that late inning magic!

    ReplyDelete
  75. No need to adjust your expectations. We're down by 1 run in the 7th. No biggie.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Yeah, you're right. It's only the 7th. What is wrong with me? :)

    ReplyDelete
  77. BELIEVE! We CAN win a road game. I think I can I think I can I think I can I think I can I

    ReplyDelete
  78. Well, if the Celtics can win a road game, I think the Red Sox can.


    It just took me 15 minutes and a pair of plyers to untie a knot in an older pair of shoes I have.

    ReplyDelete
  79. ......


    ...I can has cheezburger?

    ReplyDelete
  80. LODGY?

    ... Lefty One Dong GuY?

    ReplyDelete
  81. i got truped on that one, thanks to A's radio

    ReplyDelete
  82. yook has hit about 4 deep drives out there this series.

    ReplyDelete
  83. My level of optimism about this game has returned to what it was an hour ago. Timlin in, three runs down, and one more inning for us to tie the game.

    ReplyDelete
  84. fuckety

    sometimes the worst part of losing is confirming the expectations of the negative fans!

    ReplyDelete
  85. NOT that we've lost yet, of course...

    ReplyDelete
  86. I don't think I am a negative fan, but today I think I just didn't feel the vibe.

    ReplyDelete
  87. i don't know if you're a negative fan, but when we're behind on the scoreboard, you seem to think we will lose.

    that's what you say anyway. maybe it's just the feeling at that moment and doesn't mean that much.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Nice work from Old Yeller (he says putting the shotgun back on the shelf, but still keeping it within easy reach).

    ReplyDelete
  89. This is not good. At least Seattle sucks. We're gonna beat them, right?

    ReplyDelete
  90. I know that vibe. It is often right. But I had it strong with 2 outs in the 8th of one game (down 4? this year and was proven very wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I better leave before I start arguing with everyone. Lose a couple of games and everyone's crying.

    grumble grumble

    ReplyDelete
  92. Tek v Street

    1-for-4: 3 K, 1 HR -- + BB

    ReplyDelete
  93. Not true. I don't usually think we will lose when we are behind. However, I worry about losing. I am always hoping for the best and preparing for the worst. In baseball and in life.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Well, I'm a fan. Win a couple games and everyone is crapping rainbows. Lose a couple games and life sucks. That's just the way it goes. :P

    ReplyDelete
  95. when he's not hitting, tek looks as bad as a hitter can look.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Well, that was a lucky break. c'mon boys

    ReplyDelete
  97. fucking !@#########DFAWER@$#!@#

    ReplyDelete
  98. Bummer. Ah well, we'll put the hurt on the Mariners tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  99. I lost interest in this game early. I was watching REAL motorsports (Indy 500) and then went on a short bike ride. I'd love to have a glass of Oakland water because it's about as clean as it can get.

    You know it's bad when Allan starts to sound like Yogi Berra.

    ReplyDelete
  100. FJM has me in tears....the section that starts with "Bra. Seriously, bra."

    ReplyDelete
  101. Reds 9 Padres 9, bottom 18

    Bronson Arroyo has a pinch-hit in the game

    ReplyDelete
  102. Padres 12-9 in 18.

    Reds used 10 pitchers. Also, both teams scored 2 runs in the 11th.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Boo, Hiss.
    Thanks for that link to FJM Tim.
    I'll bookmark that, it's one of the best and funniest comebacks to idiotic opinion spewing I've heard in a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  104. FJM is essential reading.

    Hat Guy, Joe Morgan's ESPN chats, "clogging the bases", fuck the heck, Gritty McDirtstein ... all gold!

    ReplyDelete
  105. Thanks for that link to FJM Tim.
    I'll bookmark that, it's one of the best and funniest comebacks to idiotic opinion spewing I've heard in a long time.


    Cool. Yeah, I'm a constant reader now thanks to finding the link on Joy here. I've got the RSS feed for FJM in my "Links" bar on firefox, so I just click on it and it brings a drop-down menu of the latest posts. Makes it easy to check for new content...do the same with Extra Bases.

    Hat Guy, Joe Morgan's ESPN chats, "clogging the bases", fuck the heck, Gritty McDirtstein ... all gold!

    heh, I get all those references! But you can't forget "food metaphors"!

    ReplyDelete
  106. FJM wasted its time rebutting that idiotic article on why baseball was boring. Anyone who really thinks baseball should be played once a week should just be told to shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  107. rebutting that idiotic article

    Errr, that is the whole point of the site.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Yup. And I don't see why you would care what other people do with their time. You don't like it? Fine. Don't read it.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Ken Tremendous really is in fine-form. Today he had another great post.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Err, some articles are self-evidently stupid and rebut themselves.

    And I really love the "if you don't like it, don't read it" retort, the equivilent of "why don't you marry it?" and "if you hate this country so much, why don't you leave it?" Pretty lame, Tim.

    I thought Ken's article was a waste of time for him to write AND for me to read: So sue me (that's another one. You can use it sometime.)

    ReplyDelete
  111. Pretty lame, Tim.

    Tim's comment was far from being lame. It was completely appropriate.

    There are few things more irritating than readers telling bloggers not to waste their time writing what they're writing.

    As Tim said, if you don't like it, don't read it. Say you don't like it if you must. But don't say it was a waste of the writer's time. That's just arrogance.

    ReplyDelete
  112. And I really love the "if you don't like it, don't read it" retort, the equivilent of "why don't you marry it?" and "if you hate this country so much, why don't you leave it?"

    I don't think these are equivalent at all.

    Avoiding an article (or television show or movie or book) is easy, way easier (obviously) than moving out of the country. And it makes more sense. If you hate CHB or Michael Moore or nature shows, don't read or watch them.

    Applying "love it or leave it" in this case would sound like: "if that article bothers you so much, why don't you simply stop reading".

    Or suggesting your friend get a divorce if he doesn't like 100% of the things she does.

    Whereas if someone annoys you, you can usually not spend time with that person.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Err, some articles are self-evidently stupid and rebut themselves.

    Isn't the entire point of the Fire Joe Morgan site to rebut stupid stuff in the media?

    Nothing actually rebuts itself.

    ReplyDelete
  114. FJM wasted its time rebutting that ... article ... Ken's article was a waste of time for him to write ...

    I criticize the sports media too, Jack -- though I'm nowhere near as clever or humorous as Ken T. or Junior.

    Nevertheless, the next time I do, I will await your judgment on how I spent my time.

    ReplyDelete
  115. Ken Tremendous really is in fine-form. Today he had another great post.

    "... the brain-having industry ..."

    ReplyDelete