Pages

▼

June 23, 2013

G78: Tigers 7, Red Sox 5 

Red Sox - 021 100 001 - 5 12  3
Tigers  - 210 000 13x - 7  8  0
Example
Felix Doubront / Justin Verlander
Ellsbury, CF
Victorino, RF
Pedroia, 2B
Ortiz, DH
Napoli, 1B
Gomes, LF
Drew, SS
Lavarnway, C
Iglesias, 3B
at

10 comments:

  1. 9caseyJune 23, 2013 at 7:28 AM

    Why does it feel like Pedey could have 100 rbi's at this point in the season.

    ReplyDelete
  2. allanJune 23, 2013 at 8:03 AM

    Because he is #2 in MLB in runners on base when he bats. He has come to the plate with 251 runners on base. Only Prince Fielder (257) has more. (Napoli is #8, btw.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. 9caseyJune 23, 2013 at 11:36 AM

    The Blue Jays might have found their groove.

    ReplyDelete
  4. allanJune 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM

    Troll.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 9caseyJune 23, 2013 at 5:03 PM

    A couple tweets after that one. He dogged out the Bruins. One day that guys heart is going to burst due to negativity.

    ReplyDelete
  6. allanJune 23, 2013 at 5:07 PM

    Negativity is all that is keeping him going. He's far more likely to drop dead if Boston teams keep winning.

    ReplyDelete
  7. hrstrat57June 23, 2013 at 5:37 PM

    I ignore.....

    ReplyDelete
  8. laura kJune 23, 2013 at 5:44 PM

    DNFTT!! Especially if their initials are CHB.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Tom DePlontyJune 24, 2013 at 8:07 AM

    CHB is just mad because the Sox have made it through this stretch of schedule and are still 2 GA.

    I found this series weirdly encouraging. It could easily have gone 2-2 (Bailey saves the first game) or even 3-1 in our favor (maybe if the Nava catch was called correctly). I think we're probably going to end up in a playoff series with Detroit, and they did not blow us off the field - we can definitely beat them.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Maxwell HorseJune 24, 2013 at 9:00 AM

    I agree with Tom in that it could be argued the Sox were close to winning this series. Just one change might've done it: Farrell needs to stop putting Bailey into 1-run-lead situations.

    ReplyDelete