Pages

August 4, 2007

G110: Red Sox 4, Mariners 3

Dice for seven and then Dimmer and Snuffer to nail it down. From a distance, that's how it looked, but upon closer inspection, it wasn't quite as smooth as it should have been.

Matsuzaka (7-6-2-2-10) allowed two solo home runs (while getting out of serious jams in the third and fourth innings) and left with a 4-2 lead. Gagne retired the first two Mariners in the eighth, but then allowed singles to Broussard (who stole second) and Lopez to bring Seattle to within one run. A double from Lopez put runners at second and third, but Betancourt tapped back to the mound.

Papelbon struck out Ichiro and Vidro to start the bottom of the ninth, but both walked Guillen (who was trying to avoid being the first Mariner in history to strike out five times in one game) and Ibanez. None of the pitches were all that wild; in fact, a few balls looked like they could/should have been strikes. But with the winning run at first, Beltre swung at the first pitch and fouled out to Varitek.

So Gagne and Bot faced 11 batters in two innings -- three hits, two walks, one run -- not textbook, but it's a win. Still 7 GA.

(23 strikeouts in the game, 13 by the Sox staff.)

***

Daisuke Matsuzaka (3.75, 120 ERA+) / Jarrod Washburn (4.11, 103 ERA+)

The Red Sox have lost their last nine games at Safeco Field. Their last win came on July 21, 2006. Coco Crisp vs Washburn: 10-for-18 (.556), five doubles, four RBI.

Afternoon finals:
Yankees 16, Royals 8
Toronto 9, Texas 5

126 comments:

  1. Ok - your inane statistic today is :
    From today's press pass - 5 IS THE MAGIC NUMBER: Each of Boston’s last 5 losses have come when scoring 4 runs or less…Boston is 2-9 in its last 11 games when scoring 4 or fewer runs (19-37 overall when scoring 4 or less)…By contrast, the Sox are 47-6 when scoring 5 runs or more this season, with wins in each of their last 9 such contests.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So what you're saying is our pitching needs run support of 5 or more in order to be effective?

    How does that compare to any other team's records with more or less than 5 runs?

    ReplyDelete
  3. How does that compare to any other team's records with more or less than 5 runs?

    Not sure, am looking at numbers now, but my gut says that the stats for other teams will be closer to their w /l percentage.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The press notes of different teams give different categories, so it's hard. Maybe s1c has a better source.

    When Yankees score 4+: 56-23, .709
    When Mets score 4+: 49-14, .777

    ReplyDelete
  5. When Sox score 3 or 4: 11-14
    When Sox score 5+: 47-6

    so

    When Sox score 3+: 58-20, .744

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tigers
    Score 5+: 49-10, .831
    Score 0-4: 12-37

    Angels
    Score 4+: 52-15, .776
    Score 0-3: 11-30

    Dodgers
    Score 4+: 49-19, .721
    Score 0-3: 9-32

    Devil Rays
    Score 5+: 33-18, .647
    Score 0-4: 8-49

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lineups:

    Pedroia, 2B
    Youkilis, 1B
    Ortiz, DH
    Ramirez, LF
    Lowell, 3B
    Varitek,C
    Drew, RF
    Crisp, CF
    Lugo, SS

    Suzuki, CF
    Vidro, DH
    Guillen, RF
    Ibanez, LF
    Beltre, 3B
    Broussard, 1B
    Johjima, C
    Lopez, 2B
    Betancourt, SS

    ReplyDelete
  8. So, looking at what Sock put up, it appears that maybe those stats aren't a whole better than other teams. So truly it is an inane stat, but not long ago the Sox were like 38 and 0 when scoring 5 or more.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That's like when someone says, for example, "Jim Rice has 25 home runs this season, 13 of those coming at home." Uh, and? If it's close to what it's supposed to be, just let it be and we'll assume that's the case.

    About last night--yes, after the one inning, Timlin should've come out, but many people here seemed to act like he's just totally done, after one bad outing, after a full month of great ones. In that first inning he pitched last night, he hardly got hit at all. Granted, he made some non-pitching mistakes of his own...

    As for tonight, I'd say we're due to win a game at Safeco.....

    Tim, glad you're alive. I'm changing your nickname from Tim Armstrong to Tim's Not Dead.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What is it with MLBTV refusing to show NESN on weekends? I don't like it. Not one bit.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Jim Rice has 25 home runs this season, 13 of those coming at home." Uh, and?

    It means he has 12 on the road. 12!

    ReplyDelete
  12. That's like when someone says, for example, "Jim Rice has 25 home runs this season, 13 of those coming at home." Uh, and? If it's close to what it's supposed to be, just let it be and we'll assume that's the case.

    That's what I was trying to imply.

    I get frustrated hearing stats - or factoids, or coincidences - without any context. OK, so you've just told us a number. Is it a good number, a terrible number, or an average number? How can I know if I don't know how it compares to some other numbers?

    Not picking on our venerable s1c here, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jere said...

    About last night--yes, after the one inning, Timlin should've come out, but many people here seemed to act like he's just totally done, after one bad outing, after a full month of great ones.


    Stand by your man, Jere ...I'm right there with ya...none of these Timlin haters were there to rip MDC's poor showing in his Tampa Bay outing.......

    ReplyDelete
  14. many people here seemed to act like he's just totally done, after one bad outing, after a full month of great ones

    And someone here is conveniently forgetting the many months of bad outings before that one month of good outings.

    We are acting like he is totally done because the evidence supports it. We're not giving up on the guy out of nowhere. We're seeing exactly what we always expect to see from him. The past month confounded those expectations, but now they are re-confirmed.

    ReplyDelete
  15. MDC is young and full of promise.

    Timlin is old and full of...

    I don't know what, I can't close the metaphor. He's just washed up, is all.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Holy Shit, a 12 pitch inning, at this pace he can go 14...on gamdeay it says he maxed out at 97.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Lotsa fastballs from Dice-K. Me likey.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I wanna see who ended up w/the 755 ball! Replays I've seen show a fight, but we never see who wins.

    Bonds did his best to overshadow A-Rod.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Tiz on 2nd with 1 out. It would be nice to get him home.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Wow. Selig declines invitation to speak to ESPN anouncers! As said by our own Dave O'Brien. Wow.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bonds walks, but as Hershiser points out, he was swingin' for the fences, not letting up and waiting to get back to SF to break record.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Tek: hoping for HR. Let's say center field.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Manny will get no credit here.

    ReplyDelete
  24. MBM beats the throw!

    Tek with 2 RBI. Wow.

    ReplyDelete
  25. And Manny is NOT thrown out at the plate!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Did Seattle network show Manny chugging all the way from first? Or are they saying he just was running for a pizza and happened to run along the basepaths?

    ReplyDelete
  27. I have FSN on mute, so I don't know, but they did show the slide from about 4 angles. I assume they are saying he missed the plate with his hand?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Though Drew was, for all intents and purposes.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Well NESN showed MBCarllewis. All the way around. They made no mention of a possibility of missing home.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Just saw footage of Slappy hitting 500. He stands stock still at the plate watching it, then takes a few little steps towards first. I wonder if Manny ever stood at the plate that long.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I'm writing about that right now, actually....

    ReplyDelete
  32. FSN NW gave Manny credit for running hard and making a good slide.

    Good call sending Manny home with The Artist Formerly Known As JD Drew on deck and 2 out, I think.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Dice is doing his own Houdini impression tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Not picking on our venerable s1c here, of course

    from dictionary.com venerable - extremely old or obsolete; ancient

    I said it was inane - but it did spark discussion?

    Good two out hit by tek - now lets get some breathing space.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Dice has stayed out of the "bad inning." I want more runs, so we don't have to worry about that....

    ReplyDelete
  36. Tina almost got thrown out on that one!

    ReplyDelete
  37. 4-1! Ask and I shall proverbially R.

    ReplyDelete
  38. A break for the Sox, lets add some more though!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Guess I'll head home when this half inning ends. Should be able to catch the 8th and 9th.

    ReplyDelete
  40. What? No third for Manny? Remy says it's the right play? He's running toward the wall!! If he misses it and you're tagging, you still score!

    ReplyDelete
  41. Yeah, Dice! Awesome. 4-1 after 6.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Under 100? He ain't done. Let's take him out ourselves by adding like six runs here, though.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Ryan Rowland-Smith in. Who's next, Billy Jim-Jensen?

    (NY-area, 80s, reference. And yes, I know it was Roland Smith, but close enough.)

    ReplyDelete
  44. Oka up. Smart. Have him at the ready.

    ReplyDelete
  45. It might be time for OkaGagPap

    ReplyDelete
  46. First we have to have this at bat for Japanese televison......

    ReplyDelete
  47. What's the point of having all that relief pitching?

    ReplyDelete
  48. San Francisco Red Sox Fan said...
    What's the point of having all that relief pitching?

    We have the same number as everybody else ares are just better....

    Smart ass aside ..I agree...

    ReplyDelete
  49. It is amazing though after 111 pitches he is still hitting 97...

    ReplyDelete
  50. G'night Ms in 7th. We go 8th. Great job by Dice tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  51. He is a strange pitcher...10 ks 2 solo shots 2 bb's and 2 hb and he can go 84 with a breakin ball and 97 with a fastball......sit dead red...

    ReplyDelete
  52. JD Drew......His real name :David Jonathan Drew

    ReplyDelete
  53. 68 MPH on that pitch from EGads.

    ReplyDelete
  54. San Francisco Red Sox Fan said...
    shouldn't he be DJ Drew?

    Unless I'm the dyslexic one...

    ReplyDelete
  55. RE: J.D. - wouldn't be surprised to find that is a family thing. I have a nephew that is called J.D. - David Johnathon - We call him J.D. to separate from his dad.

    ReplyDelete
  56. s1c said...
    RE: J.D. - wouldn't be surprised to find that is a family thing. I have a nephew that is called J.D. - David Johnathon - We call him J.D. to separate from his dad.

    Why not call him David?

    ReplyDelete
  57. WWJDD if he was DJDrew?

    if a wood chuck could chuck wood?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Damn, he's got that "Wakefield fastball" slowball. About as hard to hit as a knuckleball.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Gagne's got the accent on the E. And it's above the nameplate.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Jere said...
    Gagne's got the accent on the E. And it's above the nameplate.

    Damn Canucks

    ReplyDelete
  61. Enough of this bring in the Bot

    ReplyDelete
  62. So shouldn't the accent be on the second syllable?

    Oh, and also....come on, GagnE, get out of this!

    ReplyDelete
  63. Ooh, in Canada, they must not roll the ball to first. Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Jere said...
    Ooh, in Canada, they must not roll the ball to first. Interesting.

    Why what did he do

    ReplyDelete
  65. Ooh, in Canada, they must not roll the ball to first. Interesting.

    They don't in Montreal. They do in the rest of Canada.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Tito would have taken any other pitcher out in that situation.....Lets not handle this guy with kid gloves

    ReplyDelete
  67. "Why what did he do"

    I don't know, but the ball traveled through the air, as if by magic. Canadian magic. I woulda just bowled it over there.

    ReplyDelete
  68. I assumed you called the father DJ and thats why you called him JD

    ReplyDelete
  69. Jere said...
    "Why what did he do"

    I don't know, but the ball traveled through the air, as if by magic. Canadian magic

    Pissin my pants here..Canadian Magic!

    ReplyDelete
  70. How about a base hit, and 5-3, Youk?

    ReplyDelete
  71. If the dad's just David, there's no need to differentiate!

    ReplyDelete
  72. The DJ could stand for David, Jr.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Jere said...
    The DJ could stand for David, Jr.

    Yeah....But thye call him JD too...

    ReplyDelete
  74. Oh wait, the kid's JD. Forget it.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Jere said...
    If the dad's just David, there's no need to differentiate!

    Unless s1c is JD Drew's Uncle

    ReplyDelete
  76. This is a real Nancy Drew mystery. A DN.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Shit ..Its after one the kids and wife are all sleepin and I'm down here laughin like a 4 year old

    ReplyDelete
  78. The dad is David
    The nephew is David Jonathon
    We call the nephew JD so that we don't get them both answering when we call for david. I didn't say it made sense, that is just the way it is!

    ReplyDelete
  79. Is s1c's dad named Steve One Charles? And they call him s1 to differentiate, even though they're both s1? But dad goes by Steve?

    Nice K, Pap.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Jere...........STOP......PLEASE

    ReplyDelete
  81. Ok. One more out and you norms can go to bed, and we owls can continue to stay up later than this as usual.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Pap hitting 90 is like Wakefield to these Ms. Oh, except these guys weren't up last inning.

    Oh! That was a swing! And a strike! Ok, maybe not. Should've got the call oe way or the other...

    ReplyDelete
  83. s1c is for something else, my dad's name was charles though!

    One more strike then I can finish my audit!

    ReplyDelete
  84. First time in a while I did the stand and clap, only to have to sit again.

    ReplyDelete
  85. great, Jones pulls a Roberts and a single can tie it. But Pap will get this guy.

    ReplyDelete
  86. So we gotta sweat through a Gagne save AND a Pap save in the same game now??

    ReplyDelete
  87. Back to Back BBs. Come on, now.

    ReplyDelete
  88. ok, that's what we needed. eck.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Have to love an opposing batter who swings at the first pitch after two consecutive walks!!

    My freaking blood pressure can calm down now!

    ReplyDelete
  90. yeah!!!!!!! I hope early bird Yankee fans stayed up for this one..... doubtful, as they're long asleep, dreaming of the distant past when they were champs.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Deities getting a lot of credit here, who are we, DJ Drew?

    Good night. Maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Hooray, Canada. Our sons' command was a little off tonight, but we'll take it. Okay, now g'night.

    ReplyDelete
  93. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Does anyone know where I can watch last inning of tonight's game? (RS 4 M 3?) I have a full MLB TV account but can't seem to find the archive page anymore (God I hate MLB websites!)

    ReplyDelete
  95. Maria - if you go to the MLB.com scoreboard page, then click on the inning you want to watch, it should pop up.

    ReplyDelete
  96. s1c said...
    Maria - if you go to the MLB.com scoreboard page, then click on the inning you want to watch, it should pop up.

    I never knew that ...that is the best thing I 've seen all day....Thanks sic!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  97. Not picking on our venerable s1c here, of course

    from dictionary.com venerable - extremely old or obsolete; ancient


    Oh shit, sorry about that! I meant wise and worthy. (PS, use a real dictionary!)

    ReplyDelete
  98. Wow, I missed a fun game thread last night, full of Canuckistan jokes and dyslexia. Damn west coast games (and work the next day). Brak brak and all that.

    ReplyDelete