Pages

August 11, 2007

G116: Red Sox 6, Orioles 2

Beckett (8.2-8-2-0-8, 115) was one strike away from a complete game shutout. Tito needed to use both MDC (12-pitch walk to Huff) and Snuffer (3 pitches to Mora, P4).

Drew: 3-for-5, 2 2B, 2 RBI
Lugo: 2-for-3, 2B, BB, 2 RBI
Varitek: 1-for-3, 2 BB, 2 RS
Pedroia: 2-for-4, RBI
Ortiz and Manny: 1-for-9, 5 K, 13 total LOB

Chokers in Cleveland (Mussina/Byrd) at 7 PM. Feel free to discuss here.

***

Josh Beckett (3.31, 137 ERA+) / Garrett Olson (3.86, 113 ERA+)

Itching to see a no-hitter? Well ...
No Red Sox hitter has faced 23-year-old Garrett Olson, who will make just his third Major League start.
It's the Fox game.

294 comments:

  1. Why yes, I was rater wanting to see a no-hitter. I'd just rather see it from INSIDE the ballpark than via slingbox on my phone from the jersey turnpike which is seeming more and more likely. Grrr... 20mph would be an improvement.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm thinking that Cy Olson will do the honors, however, not JB.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, I hear you there, but I'm choosing to believe otherwise! Not that it matters, since I'm not likely to see any of it at this rate. Still in Jersey.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lineups?

    Steven Krasner has 'em:

    Pedroia 2b
    Youkilis 1b
    Ortiz dh
    Ramirez lf
    Lowell 3b
    Varitek c
    Drew rf
    Crisp cf
    Lugo ss

    Roberts 2b
    Patterson cf
    Markakis rf
    Tejada ss
    Millar 1b
    Huff dh
    Mora 3b
    Hernandez c
    Payton lf

    ReplyDelete
  5. More from the ProJo blog:

    Dustin Pedroia has multiple hits in 12 of his last 21 games. He is 34 for 88 (.386) during that stretch. Pedroia has a team-high five-game hitting streak, during which he is 9 for 18 (.500) with a double, a home run and a walk.

    J.D. Drew has not hit a home run since June 20, in Atlanta.

    Eric Gagne has surrendered six runs in 3.1 innings since joining the Red Sox.

    Orioles vs. Josh Beckett
    Jay Payton, 8 for 18 (.444)
    Brian Roberts, 3 for 9 (.333), 2 2B, HR, BB
    Melvin Mora, 2 for 7 (.286), 2 2B
    Ramon Hernandez, 5 for 18 (.278), 3 2B
    Aubrey Huff, 4 for 15 (.267), 2B, BB
    Nick Markakis, 2 for 10 (.200), 2B, 2 BB
    Tike Redman, 1 for 5 (.200), BB
    Kevin Millar, 1 for 6 (.167)
    Miguel Tejada, 2 for 13 (.154), HR
    Corey Patterson, 1 for 12 (.083), BB
    Brandon Fahey, 0 for 3
    Paul Bako, 0 for 7, 3 BB
    Jay Gibbons, 0 for 11

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brian Roberts, 3 for 9 (.333), 2 2B, HR, BB
    Melvin Mora, 2 for 7 (.286), 2 2B
    Ramon Hernandez, 5 for 18 (.278), 3 2B

    A high % of extra bases hits from these guys: 8 out of of 10!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Sox are winning this one. Big time. Olson's getting crushed. (Please?)

    You know, I just don't set much store by individual pitcher-batter lifetime stats. Even 50, 100 at-bats between them, it seems like it would be more an indication of who had been lucky than who owned whom.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I totally agree. Just offering them as a public service.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You know, I just don't set much store by individual pitcher-batter lifetime stats. Even 50, 100 at-bats between them, it seems like it would be more an indication of who had been lucky than who owned whom.

    Especially in long careers. It's meaningless.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Although my least favourite is batter or pitcher vs teams. That's just completely ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Although my least favourite is batter or pitcher vs teams.

    What about the "modest three-game hitting streak"?

    ReplyDelete
  12. wow living in brookyln i never get to see the sox on fox! good thhing the mets and MFY play later...
    yes, we SHOULD wins this puppy.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Why don't you get the Fox national game in Brooklyn when the Sox are on? We always did in NYC.

    ReplyDelete
  14. What about the "modest three-game hitting streak"?

    argh

    Is he riding that streak, or toting it?

    ReplyDelete
  15. L-girl said...
    Why don't you get the Fox national game in Brooklyn when the Sox are on? We always did in NYC.

    cause they usually show the yanks or the mets....

    ReplyDelete
  16. cause they usually show the yanks or the mets....

    You mean there are two national games and one of them usually is a NY team?

    ReplyDelete
  17. No fair balls hit by the Sox until Olson's 24th pitch.

    I wonder what the known record is?

    ReplyDelete
  18. not sure how it works...it seems like theres a couple of "national games" depending which market yr in. all i know is that i missed maybe 4 or 5 sox games last year do to this and i believe 2 so far...and had to suffer thru gameday.

    today for instance, if i lived in st. louis id be seeing the la/cards game...

    ReplyDelete
  19. Got to be either BBs or Ks to start a game.

    Tigers record for consecutive strikeouts to start a game is 6 by John Hiller against Cleveland, August 6, 1968

    Mets record is also 6 -- Pete Falcone, vs. Philadelphia, May 1, 1980

    World Series record is 5
    Mort Cooper, Cardinals, October 11, 1943
    Sandy Koufax, Dodgers, October 23, 1963

    ReplyDelete
  20. AL record is 7 -- Joe Cowley of Rangers against Chicago, May 28, 1986 (no pitch count available)

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'm wondering what the most pitches a pitcher has thrown in a start before a fair ball is hit.

    Olson threw 23 today.

    The pitcher can only walk, strikeout or hit the batters.

    ReplyDelete
  22. And there goes the other no-hitter! Tangible.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yippie kiiii now lets get them home

    ReplyDelete
  24. b2b hits from varitek and dj werd - what are the odds?!

    ReplyDelete
  25. No question we make the Beckett deal! You'd give up Beckett for Hanley Ramirez? Shit.

    ReplyDelete
  26. pitching pitching pitching

    that's how you win in october. not hanley ramirez vs lugo.

    ***

    anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  27. fuckin coco.

    let's not waste this.

    ReplyDelete
  28. How are you looking it up?

    The Google.

    "most strikeouts to start game"

    Hardly the best way.

    I'm stopping now, though.

    ReplyDelete
  29. i'll continue to curse lugo if he keeps producing everythime i voice my haterd for him!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hanley Ramirez is Jose Reyes Jr.

    Funny you say that. I think Jose Reyes is so over-rated.

    Beckett is money, but he will get hurt.

    Hanley Ramirez will never get hurt?

    IMO, the answer to your original question is obvious. I'm interested to hear what others say. Redsock, 9Casey, s1c...?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Hanley Ramirez is Jose Reyes Jr.. what he brings to your ballclub is inestimable.

    It's intangible??? I want stuff that can be measured, stuff that contributes to wins.

    You can't get pitchers like Beckett for free, you got to give up quality (or potential quality). I do the trade 11 out of 10 times.

    ReplyDelete
  32. hanley ramirez already got hurt.
    hes gonna have that shoulder problem for the rest of his life. popping in and out..

    ReplyDelete
  33. I was pretty shocked at how badly Lugo has been doing this year... he's always been a pretty solid player.

    Sure, we all were. He's been fine since the huge o-fer ended.

    (Didn't someone post his numbers since July 8 yesterday?)

    i'll continue to curse lugo if he keeps producing everythime i voice my haterd for him!

    Keep it up, you're doing great!

    ReplyDelete
  34. I'm stopping now, though.

    I'm glad. :)

    ReplyDelete
  35. Yes, Lugo has been mostly a big bag of suck. A 63 OPS+ (hell, even the SWHB is at 74).

    Any Yankees near 63 for comparison? Cairo is at 70. Kevin Thompson at 59.

    No one expected such a dismal performance. I wish Tito would stop hitting him leadoff every so often. It's beyond stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hey you all, even though I'm at work today, I'm in a great mood, listening to music and following the game on gameday, and here's my prediction for the rest of the season.

    The Yankees will never come closer than 5 games of us.

    And they will lose the wildcard by 1 game.

    How's that? (Yankee Mike, your answer doesn't count. :) )

    ReplyDelete
  37. anyone else feel like theyre watching C's vs. Hawks '88 style, with dick stockton doing the game? haha

    ReplyDelete
  38. Come on Manny, over the wall with that ball!

    ReplyDelete
  39. And Beckett is young. He's only six month older than Papelbon.

    Plus we signed me after the trade for 3 years at an average of only 10 per (and a club option for 2010).

    ReplyDelete
  40. anyone who thinks Jose Reyes is overrated, has never seen him play

    and anyone who thinks that's how you judge a player's worth isn't really qualified to judge

    It's also unfortunate not enough national attention gets drawn to the 100 million being dished out for Drew and Lugo.

    Why's that, Mike? Why should "national attention" be drawn to two players salaries? What's your point?

    ReplyDelete
  41. I don't get it. The day I'd wander over to a Yankees blog to say "Jeter - I hate him deeply, but imagine...".

    (I don't hate Jeter deeply or any other way. I'm just wondering why people bother.)

    ReplyDelete
  42. Ortiz having to take so many days off is going to be huge...

    There has been no mention whatsoever of his future playing schedule.

    Pedroia, I hate him deeply

    Why?

    ReplyDelete
  43. And Beckett is young. He's only six month older than Papelbon.

    Oh yeah? Well Hanley Ramirez is only 2 years old!

    ReplyDelete
  44. wow, same typing and everything :)

    ReplyDelete
  45. Yeah, the Red Sox are never a national story. Toiling away in obscurity.

    ReplyDelete
  46. And spending all that money. How awful. Says a Yankees fan.

    But don't worry, he's "respectful".

    ReplyDelete
  47. Beckett, you make the trade every time. Hanley will be a good SS, but Beckett has the potential to win 18-20 games per year for the next 14 years. As for injuries? He has had 1 since he became a sox and missed 3 starts. That is much better than the Marlins every got out of him.

    as L-girl said PITCHING, PITCHING&#10083 &#10083

    Drew&#10083 &#10083

    ReplyDelete
  48. Glad folks agree re Hanley/ Beckett. Seems like a no-brainer to me.

    s1c what do those squares mean?

    ReplyDelete
  49. Mike said...
    Ortiz ... Pedroia ... Lowell ... 100 million being dished out for Drew and Lugo.


    It sounds like you are trolling for an argument.

    We don't do that here.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I will try harder not to take the bait.

    ReplyDelete
  51. the squares are symbols of some type (typing alt-xxx). they don't come through.

    ReplyDelete
  52. the squares are symbols of some type

    that much i knew. i was looking for the translation.

    ReplyDelete
  53. what with the fucking first pitch hacking, ococ?

    ReplyDelete
  54. This game is very important. Now is no time for a slide.... NY is right behind us and crushing their opponents in the proces.

    ReplyDelete
  55. if he wants to hang out and chat, that's cool. (we had fun with that tigers fan during the detroit series.)

    but anything even remotely trollish will be deleted asap. i don't issue warnings.

    ReplyDelete
  56. This game is very important. Now is no time for a slide.... NY is right behind us and crushing their opponents in the proces.

    I disagree.

    Five games is not "right behind". This game is no more important than any other game. We have to win as many as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  57. See you in the playoffs

    If you have a television, you can.

    ReplyDelete
  58. you all are so jaded

    you should get a dictionary.

    you can love Beckett all you want, but you cannot discredit Hanley's talent

    find one post where anyone did that.

    go. now. find one.

    you asked a question, we all answered. we'd rather have beckett than hanley ramirez. no one discredited hanley.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I'm not very good at that not-baiting-taking thing, am I.

    ReplyDelete
  60. my 4 years of going to school in boston have made me bitter.

    Four years of school in Boston? Poor kid. The owner of this blog lived in NYC for almost 20 years.

    ReplyDelete
  61. could we discuss the fucking game, please? or cereal? or some county in CT without nesn?

    in second place, not very far behind are the Red Sox...whose fans cry Evil Empire. 100 million for Dice K, 70 for JD drew, 40 for Lugo...

    give it a fucking rest.

    see you in the first round.

    it is impossible for the sox and yanks to meet in the first round.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Fragging dog - making me miss posts the squares are symbols of some type (typing alt-xxx). they don't come through.

    Actually I am using the decimal Unicode for the heart.

    Feeling pretty good since I actually got some fragging sleep today! So thought I would be different. However, if L-girl is getting just boxes it just isn't worth the effort :)

    ReplyDelete
  63. could we discuss the fucking game, please? or cereal? or some county in CT without nesn?

    i'm trying. you wouldn't believe it, but i'm actually trying to restrain myself.

    ok, back to the game.

    i promise.

    ReplyDelete
  64. wild card cannot play team within its own division

    ReplyDelete
  65. Whew - lucked out there!

    Shut up about the MFY!

    ReplyDelete
  66. Mike... the Yankees are not the "Evil Empire", just a monopoly on a sport. When teams have all the cash to get what players they wat while other teams can't, the sport becomes less competitive. In essence, NY has always had the capital, hence the amount of championships and Pennants.

    Baseball needs a cap, that insures competition nd spreads the fan nostalgia of a possibility that any team could go to the World Series. As a result, baseball would generate more money....

    Monopolies kill competition making baseball less of a game between players and more of a business.

    ReplyDelete
  67. You can be anti-Yankees and still be anti-salary-cap. I oppose a salary cap.

    But we're trying to talk about the game, right?

    ReplyDelete
  68. Not cursing, he's just driving me nuts. About the third time in the last 30 minutes that he has been back and forth from outside!

    ReplyDelete
  69. Baseball has been a business since 1860 or so.

    This ain't new.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Monopolies kill competition making baseball less of a game between players and more of a business.

    Markus, baseball is a business and always has been.

    You might not want to use that argument, it is too easily ripped.

    ReplyDelete
  71. And how the hell can 1 team out of 30 be a monopoly?

    ReplyDelete
  72. Haha..

    MFY...'Jeter Swallows'...etc.

    That's precisely the thing I am talking about.

    Should've known..


    Jesus Mike, have you been to Yankee Stadium when the Sox are in town????

    ReplyDelete
  73. My only problem with the salary structure right now, is that if you are going to enforce a Luxury Tax that spreads money to the smaller market teams, THEY NEED TO SPEND THAT MONEY TO MAKE THEIR TEAM BETTER, not pocket it.

    End of Rant.

    ReplyDelete
  74. 'Jeter Swallows'

    Actually that's the kind of shit I delete.

    ReplyDelete
  75. its nice being a red sox fan right nw. you only have to worry about yrself.
    as for the yanks, they have to worry about not only themselves...but a lot of different variables.

    ReplyDelete
  76. s1c, you're so right. it's amazing that the owners of the Royals, Twins, etc can just pocket that money, not even obliged to put it back into player development or salaries.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Actually that's the kind of shit I delete. ditto!

    ReplyDelete
  78. Fair shmair, you are ruining this game thread.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Oh, P.S.

    We don't say "That said" around here.

    Seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  80. I was wondering if you'd snag him on that! :)

    ReplyDelete
  81. Mike, if you have to interview us, could you at least ask questions that make one iota of sense?

    ReplyDelete
  82. What is wrong with boiler rooms? freaking spend most of my life in those!

    Come on Josh, lets get a DP here. Ok, a K will do!

    ReplyDelete
  83. TEK - Oh Captain, My Captain!

    ReplyDelete
  84. redsock... In general you are right. I'm implying a balance between sport and business. The business end insures that teams like NY will become yearly favorites with the revenue they generate. Some favor the business aspect over the game. I would just like balance....

    Let coaches and players decide what teams wins the game. $$$$$ has too much influence on the game.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Heh, that's where Allan went, he was collecting links. :)

    And yes it has sort of sucked to be a Yankee fan this year...

    Poor you.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Fox was making fun of Francona meeting with Papelbon in the Boiler room of his apartment. At least he wasn't boiling etc.

    ReplyDelete
  87. $$$$$ has too much influence on the game.

    I could show you quotes from 1860, 1890, 1910, 1930, 1950, 1970 and 2000 that say this exact thing.

    It has never been any other way.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Do I need to go on?

    Actually, I don't because even though they still have the #1 payroll, they've stopped winning.

    Facts are wonderful things. We rely on them here.

    ReplyDelete
  89. I know my shit, please don't treat me like I don't.

    Please don't come around here asking stupid questions.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Money and who has it will always be a part of the game. Always has been. Go back and look at year end trades before free agency and you will see a ton being for cash considerations. That is why the KC Royals etc. have to be smart with their scouting etc.

    ReplyDelete
  91. That's just my opinion. It's not my blog.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Beckett, Dice-K, Wakefield, Lester

    Buchholz? Someone from somewhere else? The Bot will not start.

    I know my shit, please don't treat me like I don't.

    Except for the first place team not playing the wild card from its own division, perhaps.

    ReplyDelete
  93. that makes your rotation next year: Beckett, Dice-K, Wakefield, Lester?

    Yeah, Theo will forget to get us a 5th starter or to replace Wakefield if necessary. If Schilling leaves and Papelbon closes, I guess we'll just have a 3 man staff.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Now I have work. See you soon.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Mike, perhaps you "know your shit" on things Yankees-related. However, if you knew the first thing about the Red Sox, you would know that Papelbon is the closer. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  96. I better get out of here while this "respectful" Yankees fan is hanging around. Later.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Beckett, Dice-K, Wakefield, Lester?

    Hmm, let's see thats 14 wins, 13 wins, 13 wins as of right now. So the top three next year will probably be projected to win somewhere between 52-58 games.

    Oh, yeah, lets not forget Bucholtz who might win 10 games next year just in august and september.

    I will take those four or five pitchers.

    Meanwhile the Yanks top three will be Wang (good but over rated), Hughes (might win 15) and who?

    ReplyDelete
  98. Who cares about separation? I don't. (I don't even care that their payroll is so high.)

    You wrote The Yankee teams that actually starting win the WS recently weren't built on high payroll ... no way.

    The #1 payroll is high -- by definition.

    You were dead wrong. On every single year.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Wow you all are testy in here... good God.

    No one is forcing you to stay.

    FYI: Unlike 99% of most blogs, boards, etc., I insist on civil behaviour. Trolling for comments on Sox salary or whatever will not be met with happiness.

    So be civil or go the fuck home.

    ReplyDelete
  100. Not 20 years in NY. More like 40. I'm from New York.

    I was a Yankees fan - a diehard, went to tons of games, playoffs, WS - until 2003.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Rookie contracts, sure. What about the big money mistakes that Steinbrenner could just eat and move on?

    ReplyDelete
  102. You said the 1996 payroll was not high

    In fact, it was the highest in the game.

    That's a fact.

    Who cares how they split it up?

    ReplyDelete
  103. Oh god, please don't discuss this.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Wow.... |-girl-|

    You were a NY fan for quite a while, what changed your mind?

    ReplyDelete
  105. Oh god, please don't discuss this.

    If you're talking to me, I'm done. Really. I am.

    ReplyDelete
  106. charlie hayes was splitting third with Boggs

    Hayes started only 15 games at third base for the 1996 Yankees.

    ...

    (Alright, Sock, stop it!!!!)

    ReplyDelete
  107. You could have a nice little email conversation with her about it.

    ReplyDelete
  108. First off, Mike, you may not have noticed but the Sox problem has not been starters. Whenever a starter has gone down, the Sox have called up people who have done the job. Starters ERA 4.24 in 707 2/3 innings.

    Yankees on the other hand couldn't keep their starters on the field and those they called up didn't fare well either. 28 million for Clemens ring a bell! Yankees starters - 4.71 in 646 innings.

    And don't even start with the bullpen because Mariano is the only pitcher in your pen that would make the Sox team.

    ReplyDelete
  109. needing a change from the NY scene... latching on to the 2004 winning ways... natural inclination to follow the leader

    Since I can't ban myself, I can say it:

    Stop being an asshole.

    And I don't care if think you are not being an asshole, as far as this blog goes, you are.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Let's let that Clemens question be the last of it, m'kay?

    ReplyDelete
  111. natural inclination to follow the leader

    That's true. I was tired of hanging around such a bunch of losers.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Sorry, but I was really asking an honest question.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Is anyone watching the goddamn game?

    ReplyDelete
  114. I'm watching the game..... Becket has good control today.

    ReplyDelete
  115. Why yes of course, and here comes the force out of Roberts at second!

    ReplyDelete
  116. Sorry, but I was really asking an honest question.

    His stats are online. And he's a fat fuck.

    That about covers it.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Through six, way to go Joshie!

    ReplyDelete
  118. I'm watching, as much as I can on Gameday. I'm also working. And ignoring idiots. (Some at work, some not.)

    ReplyDelete
  119. Poor Markus, he's new here, he doesn't know Clemens is the anti-christ. Check out the Joy of Sox glossary, Markus.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Yeah... well... trust me, it's not like I want him to do well.

    ReplyDelete
  121. Has any one heard about who is going to pitch in the Double Header next Friday? Just wondering if Bucholtz will be called up.

    ReplyDelete
  122. Good base running by the Youk!

    ReplyDelete
  123. Officially, I think it's Beckett/Schilling in the DH.

    But plenty of fans are wondering about Clay.

    ReplyDelete
  124. How many pitches did Olson have before getting yanked? Now they have a guy that pitches with an 7+ ERA?

    ReplyDelete
  125. I don't hate Clemens as much as most folks around here. I just think he's a freak.

    ReplyDelete
  126. You can post anything at all about Fat Billy. Anything. That's Rule #6.

    ReplyDelete
  127. I don't hate TCM, I loathe him. I'm in the camp that he tanked while with the Sox and then decided he would use the roids etc. after he left. Also, like Damon, he chose the MFY's.

    Love the Simpsons burger king commercials.

    ReplyDelete
  128. 115.....? Nice. One thing I have noticed is the Red Sox kill pitchers even in games they lose. High pitch counts.

    ReplyDelete
  129. You can post anything at all about Fat Billy. Anything. That's Rule #6.

    Written or unwritten? What's is 1-5?

    ReplyDelete
  130. Love the Simpsons burger king commercials.

    The Simpsons shouldn't be doing commercials! It's so wrong.

    Oh wait, I know, Groening needs the money, right?

    ReplyDelete
  131. I may have to post the Rules -- once I come up with them.

    Maybe FB should be Rule #1.

    ReplyDelete
  132. I may have to post the Rules -- once I come up with them.

    Badges! We don't need no stinking badges!

    Or in this case rules!

    ReplyDelete
  133. I guess I'll watch this one later tonight when it's archived.

    ReplyDelete
  134. The good thing about rules is it saves you the trouble of writing the same thing over and over. You just refer people to the rules.

    ReplyDelete
  135. Gotta have rules.

    Like everyone has to call Clemens a child molester at least once a month.

    Those kinds of rules.

    ...

    (Actually, I mean civility guidelines like I was trying to quickly explain to our friend from The Other Side. I mean, don't people know you shouldn't go into someone's house and take a dump on the living room carpet?)

    ReplyDelete
  136. Beckett has been lights out. No lead off hitters have reached for the Orioles.

    ReplyDelete
  137. I mean, don't people know you shouldn't go into someone's house and take a dump on the living room carpet?

    That's why my blog has always needed rules - guidelines. Anything with political content does, or the blog will be ruined by trolls.

    ReplyDelete
  138. (don't people know you shouldn't go into someone's house and take a dump on the living room carpet?)

    It took me 3 or 4 times before I was set straight on this, but I learned dammit. I learned. And so can you.

    ReplyDelete
  139. Unfortunately, I think our friend thought he was being civil. Notice he only tried to defend the most expensive payroll, said nothing about his starting pitching next year.

    ReplyDelete
  140. When I was being trashed regularly by wingnuts - and I mean trashed - they always said they were being respectful.

    ReplyDelete
  141. If you go back through his posts, you can see he was baiting.

    Yes, I know. I am an easy mark. Quick to my righteous anger. :)

    ReplyDelete
  142. Bases loaded..... come on Pedroia

    ReplyDelete
  143. Oh, I agree he was being a bator (and yes that is the way I want that spelled). I just think he thought he was being a nice bator.

    Good thing my BP is in the 110 range!

    ReplyDelete
  144. I think I should formerly say hello.... Boston native here. Not here to stir up problems like Mike did.

    ReplyDelete
  145. Markus, welcome, just be civil! You are a Red Sox fan right? :)

    ReplyDelete
  146. Good thing my BP is in the 110 range!

    Heh. Good thing I've mellowed with age.

    I have. A lot.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Heh. Good thing I've mellowed with age.

    LOL

    ReplyDelete
  148. Am I a Red Sox fan? Lololol.... up until 2004, I was healing from 1986, so I better be a Red Sox fan....

    ReplyDelete
  149. In that case Markus - you are more than welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  150. Baltimore's bullpen is horrendous. Anyway.... must leave to pick up my better-half. Enjoy the game folks!

    ReplyDelete
  151. Some other time I can answer your question about my conversion. The short version is I fell out of love. The Yankees drove me away and the 2003 Red Sox stole my heart.

    ReplyDelete
  152. I wonder if Sarah is out of Jersey yet.

    ReplyDelete
  153. Jere is in Baltimore this weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  154. I can't belive no one has mention McMoron. Is he off today?

    ReplyDelete
  155. Arrrgh! WMP replaces manny. Hinske in for Youk!

    ReplyDelete
  156. this may sound stupid but get gagne right back out
    there in the 9th

    ReplyDelete
  157. Isn't McMoron doing the Pirate game?

    ReplyDelete
  158. So who's doing this game? Might be the Manny Hater.

    ReplyDelete
  159. Eric Karros? Is doing this game, he's not bad.

    Last Shut out for Becket 4/10/2005.

    ReplyDelete
  160. Fox guys asked Francona about Gagne in their in game interview. He was like, hell, I ain't worried about last night, its over seems like it happened ages ago!

    I would have sent Gagne back out also.

    ReplyDelete
  161. But I don't think we have to worry about Gagne being spooked or shook up. He's not a rookie.

    ReplyDelete
  162. Fox stat - 56 wins by the Red Sox starters lead the Majors.

    1st lead off guy to reach vs Beckett?

    ReplyDelete
  163. Oops, we didn't win yet. We're not home. Hold that thought...

    ReplyDelete
  164. Damn, and I was knocking on wood when I typed it also (mainly my wooden head).

    ReplyDelete
  165. Hey Allan, I just saw the new subtitle, cool. Are you going for a subtitle-a-day?

    ReplyDelete
  166. Schilling is not the only Pitcher to have a complete game for the sox this year. God, I hate when they screw that stuff up.

    One more strike joshie.

    ReplyDelete
  167. No, just haven't settled on one.

    I'm open to suggestions.

    ReplyDelete
  168. ok oreck, make the last out here

    ReplyDelete
  169. fragging Millar.

    Time to pull him (115 pitches?)

    ReplyDelete