Pages

September 25, 2010

G154: Red Sox 7, Yankees 3

Red Sox - 003 010 201 - 7 12  1
Yankees - 000 000 021 - 3 4 0
Lester (7-2-0-3-8, 104) retired the first 12 Yankees and did not allow a hit until there was one out in the sixth. For those who care about such things, Lester is now 19-8, with one start remaining.

Boston battered Nova in the third, as Ryan Kalish was hit by a pitch, Daniel Nava walked, Lars Anderson singled, Marco Scutaro singled (1-0), J.D. Drew GIDP (2-0), Victor Martinez walked, and David Ortiz singled (3-0).

In the fifth, Drew doubled and Ortiz (facing Royce Ring) singled him home. Drew and Martinez hit back-to-back home runs to bnegint he seventh to boost the score to 6-0. The Red Sox got a run off Joba Chamberlain in the ninth as Jed Lowrie and Kalish hit consecutive doubles.

The win brought the Red Sox 5.5 GB the Yankees in the Wild Card, with eight games to play. The Rays beat the Mariners 9-1, increasing their AL East lead to 1.5 games.
Example
Jon Lester / Ivan Nova
Scutaro, 2B
Drew, RF
Martinez, C
Ortiz, DH
Beltre, 3B
Lowrie, SS
Kalish, CF
Nava, LF
Anderson, 1B
After being released by the Cardinals, infielder Felipe Lopez rejected a waiver claim by the Padres and signed with the Red Sox. He is in uniform today.

In 109 games with St. Louis, Lopez hit .231/.310/.340. Since Lopez, 30, will likely be a Type B free agent this winter, if Boston offers arbitration and Lopez declines, the team would receive a supplemental draft pick. I cannot think of any other reason to have him around.

At 7 PM: Mariners/Rays.
Example
September 25:

1965 - Satchel Paige, at age 59, starts and pitches three innings for Kansas City. It is his first major league appearance in 12 years and he allows only one hit, a double to Carl Yastrzemski. The Red Sox win 5-2.

162 comments:

  1. Jeter, SS
    Swisher, RF
    Teixeira, 1B
    Rodriguez, 3B
    Cano, 2B
    Thames, DH
    Kearns, LF
    Granderson, CF
    Cervelli, C

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, Lopez was pretty damn good last year. 3.9 WAR. Sure, there was BABIP luck involved, but he could still produce at a decent level.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Plus, how can you not like this?

    http://backporch.fanhouse.com/2010/09/22/the-dugout-the-doom-and-gloom-of-felipe-lopez/

    ReplyDelete
  4. I see The Jeter Love-a-thon is in full effect.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello. Time for some baseball. Finally.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sadly, I am working, so I need some sound.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The only probably with watching on mute is that if I am typing, I can't tell when to look back up at the screen. Or I can't type.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Put sound on. Harvey went out. He is having a hard time watching baseball. Wonder why....

    ReplyDelete
  9. The only probably with watching on mute is that if I am typing, I can't tell when to look back up at the screen. Or I can't type.

    That is L's problem when I want mute at home.

    Is H nervous? Does he still fear the Sox? :>)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Blogger keeps deleting my comments.

    Anyway, I will try again. I don't know why Harvey can't watch, but he hates the late season/post-season. Perhaps the scars of 2004? He just finds it too stressful.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Strange. I can understand worrying about the actual playoffs, but not about getting in, at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  12. He's a very sensitive guy, what can I say?

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes! Bases loaded, and no one out. How can we avoid blowing this?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bases loaded with no outs. How many will score...??

    ReplyDelete
  15. Happy Birthday, Lars!

    Amy, that's my problem re mute, too. Why not use the radio sound? That's what I've got on (at work).

    ReplyDelete
  16. Two plus two outs... now 5 more on the last out.

    ReplyDelete
  17. OK, at least we got two so far. Even with the DP.

    ReplyDelete
  18. poop - was not counting on that.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Radio? I don't even think we have one in the house! Isn't that sad??

    Plus I was trying not to disturb Harv who is avoiding baseball.

    ReplyDelete
  20. But you're using a computer. You can get the radio through that - like I am.

    ReplyDelete
  21. mccarver:

    "you can almost feel the apprehension in the crowd. what if the red sox win today ... matsuzaka tomorrow ... buchholz next friday ..."

    hahahahahahaaa

    ReplyDelete
  22. Maybe if you put it on really low it won't disturb Harvey, whose team is fading away.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Oh that's great! Whether or not it happens, it's still fucking great.

    ReplyDelete
  24. The best part of listening to this game is it means I have headphones on, which means I can't hear my annoying coworker.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Radio through the computer! Why didn't I think of that?

    Sigh, sometimes I am such a Luddite.

    But I have the TV sound on now. Annoying, but while Harv is out, I will tolerate the Fox assholes.

    ReplyDelete
  26. When we have gamethreaders following on GDGD, I always wonder (and often say) why they don't use MLB Audio. $15 for the entire season, and you can always get the feed you want.

    ReplyDelete
  27. You're no Luddite. You're not even a technophobe. You have a cell phone, you text, you're on Facebook, you comment on blogs. You use Google Reader!

    I know people who will read my blog, then say, I wanted to leave a comment but I couldn't figure out how to register.

    ReplyDelete
  28. LOL! I guess it's all relative. I know I am definitely more adept at this stuff than many my age. People do think I am strange or cool for using Facebook, depending on their perspective.

    My sister in law said she still needs to call her kids to get help with things like cut and paste. I was dumbfounded. Even my almost 80 year old mother can do that. She is even on Facebook!

    ReplyDelete
  29. NYTimes had a nice piece today about Francona and how he deserves recognition for what he has done this season.

    ReplyDelete
  30. My mother has a computer but refuses (or can't, not sure which) learn how to save, copy and paste. It's maddening. Or it used to be - I gave up trying.

    I also know some serious technophobes, people who think that they'll compromise some kind of integrity if they get a cell phone. No comprendo.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Everyone's on facebook these days. I have a 93 year old cousin with dementia who's on facebook.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Ha ha, sounds like you're a kid and your parents are home. Harvey's home, hide the Red Sox! :)

    ReplyDelete
  33. Though I wouldn't call her a luddite either.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Not everyone, Benjamin. I know lots of people who are not. But anyone can be.

    I take pride in being one of the early ones over 50 to be on Facebook as I joined back in 2003 or so when you needed to have a .edu email address. The benefits of being an academic!

    ReplyDelete
  35. In Canada, it almost is everyone. Higher percentage of people on FB here than any other country.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Yes, Laura, that's how it feels!

    But he walked in, said hi, and went to his office. Maybe he will secretly watch on his computer.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Canada is cool

    All that ice and everything. :)

    ReplyDelete
  38. Allan is a Luddite? That would make file-sharing tough.

    Srsly though, I don't see Facebook and Twitter as any mark of tech savvy. Do you?

    ReplyDelete
  39. He still scores games with a wooden pencil. :)

    ReplyDelete
  40. Annoying Co-Worker just said, "Laura, do you have time to look at some disgustingly cute pictures of my nieces and nephews?"

    I said, Sorry, not during a Red Sox - Yankees game. Maybe tomorrow.

    Maybe she'll forget.

    ReplyDelete
  41. FB couldn't be easier. I still just don't "get" Twitter. I am sure I could figure out how to use it, but I am not motivated. There is such a thing as information overload. I think Twitter would just cause me to crash and revert to the 1980s world.

    ReplyDelete
  42. He still scores games with a wooden pencil. :)

    Nope! Pens only! Special felt-tips.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Is anyone else having trouble with Blogger? It keeps coming back Service Unavailable Error 503. And then it loses my comment. Not every time, but enough to make me MAD AS HELL.

    ReplyDelete
  44. He still scores games with a wooden pencil. :)

    Can't keep that sharp for a whole game. And I don't want to end up like ol' Stanton Walker.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Service Unavailable Error 503

    I have been getting that at home. I refresh and it comes in. I thought it had to do with my wireless connection at home.

    ReplyDelete
  46. We had a whole conversation about Twitter on another thread recently. Apparently I convinced you you *could* learn how to use it! Good! :)

    I draw the line at Twitter. I already hate Facebook but find it very useful for activism. But Twitter, no. Just too much time-wasting.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Blogger is in the middle of a bunch of upgrades. That could be why. (Or not, who knows.)

    ReplyDelete
  48. OK, I will refresh instead of going Back and see if that works.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I only look at twitter when I want to know where the local vegan ice cream truck is, or if someone links to baseball trade/injury tweets.

    ReplyDelete
  50. jesus, rosenthal. if felix does not win the cy, it will be a friggin crime.

    oh my - mcmoron making sense with silliness of wins!!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Quick Allan, turn on the radio, Castig is talking about college football.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Yes, you convinced me I COULD learn, but you also convinced me it was not worth the effort! Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  53. OK, I will refresh instead of going Back and see if that works.

    I think it was when going to a page. Not sure how comments will work.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Quick Allan, turn on the radio, Castig is talking about college football.

    No hurry. Whenever I turn it on, that will be the case.

    (I will not be turning it on.)

    ReplyDelete
  55. I only look at twitter when I want to know where the local vegan ice cream truck is, or if someone links to baseball trade/injury tweets.

    I search Twitter to see who is tweeting wmtc posts, and I sometimes click on Twitter links on FB. But I don't have an account.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Bummer, Fox is showing Texas/Oakland (1-1! Exciting!). So it's not on MLBXtra either. Lame.

    ReplyDelete
  57. I know everybody calls them "ground rule doubles", but couldn't GDGD at least get it right

    ReplyDelete
  58. What do you call them? I think "ground rule double" is correct, and "grounds rule double" is incorrect.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Damn, I have to go. We are meeting friends for dinner in Northampton. I guess I will be using my cellphone for updates---showing I am NOT a Luddite!

    ReplyDelete
  60. I ducked out during a pitching change and came back to another pitching change! What'd I miss?

    ReplyDelete
  61. Ground rule double

    Just Wikipedia, but still.


    Which says: "Ground rule double is also the misnomer used to refer to a fairly hit ball leaving the field as described in Major League Baseball (MLB) rules 6.09(e) through 6.09(h) results from a fair ball leaving the playing field in circumstances that do not merit a home run."

    That entry is in dire need of some copy editing.

    ReplyDelete
  62. That entry is in dire need of some copy editing.

    You can just about paste that in to any Wiki entry.

    So you weren't referring to the phrase "ground rule double" but a specific circumstance that is not really one? Just guessing here, as you're not saying.

    ReplyDelete
  63. What do you call them? I think "ground rule double" is correct, and "grounds rule double" is incorrect.

    "Automatic double" is preferable.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Uch, I have to go. :(

    Enjoy the game. GO SOX!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  65. "Automatic double" is preferable.

    Why?

    ReplyDelete
  66. Because it's descriptive instead of misleading.

    ReplyDelete
  67. "Automatic double" is a baseball term, and an old one too.

    ReplyDelete
  68. I was thinking Sterling says "automatic double", which would mean we could never use it, but he says "grounds rule double".

    ReplyDelete
  69. Dear Castig and OB:

    Shut up about Joe Girardi, please.

    Thank you,

    A Sox fan getting sick of you

    ReplyDelete
  70. I prefer the older term "long hits" to "extra base hits".

    ReplyDelete
  71. Right, Sterling is "grounds rule double".

    "Automatic double" is a baseball term, and an old one too.

    I'll have to take your word for that. I grew up hearing ground rule double. And I'm old. :)

    ReplyDelete
  72. And "bingle" --

    no one uses bingle any more.

    ReplyDelete
  73. All I'm saying is that "ground rule double" is not incorrect, it's a legitimate expression. Unlike, say, "runners in scoring position" to mean "runners on 2nd and 3rd".

    ReplyDelete
  74. All I'm saying is that "ground rule double" is not incorrect, it's a legitimate expression. Unlike, say, "runners in scoring position" to mean "runners on 2nd and 3rd"

    Actually, that's a good example. "Ground rule double" is misleading, because it's a double that has nothing to do with ground rules. "Runners in scoring position" is misleading, because all runners are potentially in scoring position.

    The only thing that makes them "right" is that people use those phrases in common usage. Which is fine but still annoying.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Kearns wasn't in scoring position.

    ReplyDelete
  76. that was not a bang bang play, dick.

    ReplyDelete
  77. There's the On Fire dong I called earlier!

    ReplyDelete
  78. Hmm Benjamin, that's something to consider. Could it be I'm using the equivalent of RISP all these years, but I don't realize it b/c that's how I learned it? Hmm.

    ReplyDelete
  79. This Chad fellow is some pitcher, eh.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Cool. I turn on the TV while I'm booting up the puter, and the VERY first thing I hear is "JD Dew hits one deep. And it's GONE!"

    Holy Shit - Now a B2B! This could be fun

    ReplyDelete
  81. stockton and mccarver going ON AND ON about how bad the mfy have been playing and how they were 2.5 GA just a few days ago.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Girardi needs a 25-man pitching staff, the way he uses his bullpen

    ReplyDelete
  83. How about "Yankee faithful"? Is that a misnomer?

    Hee hee.

    ReplyDelete
  84. SoSock: You know where that bus is parked? We may need it next week.

    ReplyDelete
  85. I'm sitting on the bench beside it right now. They're gassing it up.

    ReplyDelete
  86. rosenthal: "every other AL playoff contender is LOVING this"

    ReplyDelete
  87. This is where NYY fans bitch that McCarver totally hates the Yankees.

    ReplyDelete
  88. I have to go. Amy's not here to text me the score on my way home.

    A, call my cell?

    ReplyDelete
  89. Leaving 3 hours early today, yay.

    ReplyDelete
  90. both guys saying it is the quiest crowd they have ever heard in that dump

    ReplyDelete
  91. It IS pretty damn quiet.
    And I agree Benjamin - that is cool

    ReplyDelete
  92. No time to thread tonight, but it's a fun game again tonight. Let's hope it stays that way.

    And yes to the schadenfraud.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Just saw the replay of V-Mart's homer. That was a laser shot

    ReplyDelete
  94. both guys saying it is the quiest crowd they have ever heard in that dump

    Radio saying that too.

    ReplyDelete
  95. RE: the quiet - perhaps they're having visions of a certain previous meltdown.........

    ReplyDelete
  96. perhaps they're having visions of a certain previous meltdown.........

    that is what happens when you are cursed.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Bard up. Have I mentioned lately that he's a Tarheel.... :)

    K-ROD!

    ReplyDelete
  98. bard in, reddick in rf, patterson was in lf last inning

    lester: 7-2-0-3-8, 104

    ReplyDelete
  99. mcmoron: "bard can get close to 100"

    close to?

    ReplyDelete
  100. why is joba throwing to first -- no one is there!!! -- and why is kalish not allowed to third?

    ReplyDelete
  101. Woo hoo! At the end of the 8th I thought - "OK, let's get another run or 2 for a better cushion, but let's not go too long. I have a dinner date!" Then I saw JTC take the mound and changed my tune. Let's score 5 or 6 just because it's him. (No, I don't really like him at all)

    ReplyDelete
  102. SHIT! FauX has switched to the Rangers game - What's happening in the terlet?

    ReplyDelete
  103. OK, crisis over. Rangers have clinched. Back to real baseball

    ReplyDelete
  104. 9th vs Joba:

    Lowrie double to LF corner (Navarro pinch runs)

    Kalish (bb) double to RF corner, Navarro scores, 7-2

    Patterson (cbf) K

    Anderson (bbcsb) BB

    Scutaro (bfc) K, 2 outs

    ReplyDelete
  105. Reddick (cbcbf) 5-3. Very close, though, ump paused a beat before calling out, I'd like to see a slo-mo replay.

    ReplyDelete
  106. (Fruitbat up)

    Slappy (bcb) HR to left, 7-3

    ReplyDelete
  107. bot up, too

    rays with 4 in bottom of 1st!

    ReplyDelete
  108. Cano (c) lined to pitcher, 1 out

    ReplyDelete
  109. Thomas (cb) P6 on outfield grass.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Enough morons left to go "DAY-O, DAY-O", though.

    Gardner (ccbb) 3U

    &

    The water is Muddy!!!

    Now 5.5 GB in WC!

    ReplyDelete
  111. Red Sox still mathematically alive?
    Did he think they would not be if they had lost?

    ReplyDelete
  112. I love the smell of schaedenfreude in the morning!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  113. SEA - 000 001 000 - 1 9 0
    FKR - 400 000 23x - 9 12 0

    FKR ---
    MFY 1.5
    BOS 7.0

    MFY ---
    BOS 5.5

    ReplyDelete