Pages

February 13, 2013

Who Is Held In Higher Regard By Ownership: Francona Or Valentine?

Nick Cafardo, Globe, February 11:
[W]e wondered, of the two deposed managers — Terry Francona and Bobby Valentine — which one is held in higher regard by Henry and the Sox owners?

Francona, who managed two championship teams, albeit with great talent, or Valentine, who had a record number of injuries and chaos during his year at the helm?
Nick thinks it's Valentine.

I'm not kidding. He really does. Here's the link.

25 comments:

  1. The amount of water Nick has carried for Valentine over the past 14-15 months has to rival the contents of the Pacific by now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You must not be done with book yet....lol

    ReplyDelete
  3. I finished yesterday, actually!

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Nick thinks it's Valentine"

    Thus proving conclusively it's Francona.

    ReplyDelete
  5. SoSHer hellborn: "Better president--Abraham Lincoln who won the Civil War and ended slavery, albeit with a great top-hat, or William Henry Harrison, who caught a chill during his inauguration and died."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ya did, did ya.... Is there a post on its way.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ya did, did ya.... Is there a post on its way.

    Umm, no. I wasn't planning on it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. [W]e wondered, of the two deposed managers — Terry Francona and Bobby Valentine — which one is held in higher regard by Henry and the Sox owners?

    Who wonders this? Or, for that matter, who really cares? Another example of a Boston beat writer trolling for a story that isn't there.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In that case.


    In my opinion Tito came off very insecure. He really seemed to worry about where he stood with ownership.

    And the 2004 section, gave me nothing new. The book itself gave me nothing I didn't already know. Thats just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  10. There was some new stuff in there, like Posada's "pop time" on Roberts's steal in G4.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah , your right that and his love for the clubhouse workers.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Did you get the sense he wasn't in love with Pedro?

    ReplyDelete
  13. And as much as they wanted it not to be , it did come off as though they hired him because of Schilling.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It would seem the owners blame CHB more for the comments in Tito's book than they blame Francona.

    SoSHer mabrowndog:
    "In Lucchino's recent radio interviews he's pretty much exonerated Tito from the scathing comments in his book. Instead, he laid the blame squarely at the feet of Shank."

    Also a tweet from Pete Abraham:
    "Two questions to Luchhino from @Dan_Shaughnessy. Two quick "no comments." Then he answered same questions asked by others."

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hard to say about Francona and Pedro. Pedro had his own way of doing things and his own schedule, but I didn't really get that vibe. I assume it was a mixed bag. Unlike Manny, who was apparently not a mixed bag.

    I didn't get that feeling about his hiring at all. Francona had been extensively interviewed and had spent several days actually working at Fenway before his hiring was announced - and before the Schilling courtship started. It totally helped in getting Schilling to seriously consider a trade to Boston, though.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It is a shame that Francona signed off on all of the snide comments against Bill James and against progressive thinking in general. It was 101% obviously who was responsible for those sentences, since CHB would include a gratuitous insult and then quote Francona as basically agreeing with James.

    Also, whole sections of the book seemed like they were written extremely fast. When going through some later seasons (like 2008 or 2009), it read like a first draft that needed to be fleshed out.

    Still, I enjoyed almost all of it. Only when CHB was getting in his usual digs was it annoying.

    Now we need Theo to write his Red Sox book!

    ReplyDelete
  17. The thing with a book like this. It just looks like a money grab. Because they all still work int he game or still want to work in the game. So you never ever get the whole story. The last time that happened Jose Canseco wrote a book and tore the lid of baseball. And hes is shunned by most.

    I wanted more about players. It was obviuos he loved the guys like himself, the marginal players. Kapler for one he loved.

    I would have liked it if he just concentrated on the Red Sox years like the book said. But it seemed as though CHB did most of the writing about players.

    Talked way to much about car and plane rides. I think Tito even mentioned that is where they became a team, on plane rides and cribbage tournaments.

    In my opinion Tito comes off as a little odd.
    Also alot of talk of bathroom doors and his office.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 9C, what do you mean by "a money grab"?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Someone offered Tito money to write a book. He said okay then decided to give us a fluff piece. Like I said that is only my opinion.

    I just felt as though the book was writted to take a few jabs as he went away.

    In every organization there is going to be a guy everyone dislikes. Lucchino is that guy.

    ReplyDelete
  20. So it's not that he made money for the book, it's that the book isn't substantial enough, not enough going on. Glad I asked.

    I was more interested in reading it before I read your comments!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Oh, I'm sorry. I didnt want to ruin it for anybody. Read it anyways I would love to hear your thoughts as well.... And you know as well as anyone not take my opinion as gold.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I don't think L would get much out of it. Too much behind the scenes stuff that she tries to ignore during the season!

    ReplyDelete
  23. I doubt he made that much for the book. Certainly far less than he does managing - and he had to deal with CHB. So he suffered for however much he got!

    I suppose it was a cash grab in the sense that it was a high-profile firing and there are plenty of Red Sox fans who would want to read about it/Tito in general.

    I would have liked more about the 2004 and 2007 post-seasons (and comebacks). Maybe he talked about that, but CHB did not use it.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I agree Allan, fans are going to read it and want to learn about their team. The 2004 part of the book was small. Which is wierd because I believe I have seen two documentaries and read two books on just 2004.

    I know CHB doesnt give a shit about the fans. But I am not sure Tito even realized how much it meant to the fans. Like when he choose not to wear his red sox hat at the parade. Just childish,

    ReplyDelete
  25. You didn't ruin it for me!

    I was questioning the idea of a book as a cash grab because writing is seldom profitable. Usually people write because they feel they have something to say, want people to hear their side of the story, want to keep their name out there - now called "extending your brand" (gag).

    I hope he did make some decent money from it, I even hope that for CHB. Now there's solidarity for ya, good wishes for a writer whose work I despise.

    ReplyDelete