January 7, 2005

So What's The Difference?* Yesterday, many Republicans used the words "frivolous," "crying wolf" and "conspiracy theory" to describe the suggestion of some Democrats that the Ohio votes in the presidential election might need investigating. One problem was the fact that some counties had more votes cast than actual voters.

But now another day has dawned and what do we see? ... Why it's the Republicans filing a lawsuit to challenge the results of the governor's race in Washington state because (wait for it) there are "lingering questions about why the county shows more votes counted than people voting on Nov. 2."


And by "unbelievable," I mean "completely believable."

Any of the conservative people reading this blog care to explain this one?

[* - besides the fact that a Democrat won, I mean]

No comments: